Would you Help Me with a little project?

Greetings! I wanted to take a moment and let you know about two upcoming events where I will be with a book table, sharing The New Messianic Version of the Bible -- a labour of love that has taken 12 years. You can find those dates and information below. 

I also want to make a special request:

I am in the process of working on my schedule for the next six months and am looking for opportunities to share the Jewish/Hebraic Roots and background of many of the things Jesus (Yeshua) did. Would you be willing to help me be in touch with your pastor friends about me? Thank you in advance! 

Here is a short sampling of the many topics I would love to share:

MESSIAH IN THE PASSOVER 
         1 hour standard
         11/4  to 11/2 hours with communion
         11/2 hour with Sample Foods & Communion
         21/2 hours or more Banquet
It was no coincidence that Jesus chose the Passover now celebrated as communion, the Lord's supper; for the story of the Passover lamb, Jesus the Messiah could best communicate the course he would be taking over the confusing hours that were to follow. During the Passover/Easter season, representatives of Tōv Rose is available to speak to your group or church. The "Messiah in the Passover" demonstration is ideal for any Sunday, but a demonstration that includes your communion service is especially meaningful. Passover banquets are appropriate all year, but are very popular during the Passover/Easter season. Many churches find that a banquet works well on a Friday or Saturday.
FALL FEASTS OF ISRAEL 
1-hour to 90-minutes length
This can be presented in one or a series of messages that explain how the Messiah is related to the following Jewish feasts:

            Rosh Hashanah (Feast of Trumpets), which celebrates the beginning of the Jewish Civil year.
            Yom Kippur (Day of Atonement), which is considered the holiest day of the Jewish year.
            Sukkot (Feast of Tabernacles/Booths), which recalls 40 years of wandering in the wilderness, living in tents (booths) and worshiping in a portable tabernacle.

MESSIAH IN THE OLD TESTAMENT 
45-minutes to 1 hour length
This is a sermon outlining the major prophecies in the Old Testament, which predicted the coming of Messiah. It is a faith-building message that explores the plan of salvation in the Old Testament and helps Christians to better understand their Jewish neighbors.

FUTURE OF ISRAEL
45-minutes to 1 hour length
God's plan for the Jewish people is presented through the exposition of various Old and New Testament texts. We also preach a message on the future of Gentiles and their role in the redemption of Israel. A combination of these messages makes a wonderful series that is well suited for either a Sunday morning or evening service.

THE CHURCH AND THE JEWISH PEOPLE 
45-minutes to 1 hour length
This sermon is rooted and grounded in Romans chapters 9 through 11, and examines the relationship that exists between Israel and the Church. Why it important for Churches and non-Jewish Christians to understand that they are Jewish evangelism.

UNDERSTANDING THE TIMES 
45-minutes to 1 hour length
The Israeli/Palestinian Conflict, Wars & Rumors of War, is America coming to an end? What is happening in our world, and what should be our response and perspective?
Tōv is intimately acquainted with America’s history, history in the Mid-East, our national security threats, our most serious outside threats- radical Islam and virulent Hindusim in Government, and what to watch for in the future.
An expert Bible prophecy teacher, his biblical worldview helps him address with clarity the unique complexities in Israel, the Middle East, with Russia, China and Europe, and provides an understanding of how events will unfold in the days ahead.

THE REVELATION OF JESUS 
45-minutes to 1 hour length
(“...which God gave unto him, to show unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass.”  Revelation 1:1)
 A prophetic teaching combining Bible text and current events to consider the possibility that we are very near the end of the End Times.

PERSONAL TESTIMONY 
20-minutes to 1 hour length
Tōv is a Jewish believer in Jesus.  His story and background which will encourage your church.

CHAPEL SERVICES 
20-minutes to 1 hour length
In addition to ministering in the local churches and conferences, Tōv also partners with schools and seminaries, and many on our volunteer Chaplain staff are available to come bring various presentations. You can schedule a speaker for a chapel service, a class or perhaps be part of your missions' emphasis fair and conference. This would be a great opportunity for the students to learn more about Entertainment & Jewish missions and how they can participate in short-term ministry in Israel, New York City, south Florida, Los Angeles, and many more places in the North America and around the world.

THE GOD OF THE HEBREW BIBLE 
45-minutes to 1 hour length
Therefore my people shall know my name; therefore in that day I am the One who is speaking, ‘Here I am’. Isaiah 52:6
Tōv’s research began with a simple question based on the statement made by Jesus, “All things have been committed to me by my Father. No one knows the Son except the Father, and no one knows the Father except the Son and those to whom the Son chooses to reveal him.” (Matthew 11:27 KJV). Tōv says, "If no one has known God the Father, then who have my Jewish ancestors worshiped?"
This sermon exposes the secrets of “The Emmaus Road Revelation,” and promises to challenge believers to step out from behind the skirts of Jesus to “approach the throne of grace boldly” (Hebrews 4:16): The Throne of GOD, Our Father. 

Conference Schedule:

1) Thursday, November 1 - Sat, November 3

Meet & Greet/Book Table
Hebraic Roots Conference 2012
St. Michael's Church
9201 Normandale Blvd
Bloomington, MN
952-931-5276
Speakers & Performers:

Clyde Billington

(Music by) Marty Goetz

Wesley Hall

Chris Heeb

Keith Johnson

Bill Morford

Barry Segal

Lois Tverberg

Scott Volk

2) Fri, October 26 – Sat, October 27
Meet & Greet/Book Table
Bless Israel Conferenc
Redeeming Love Church
Where 2425 White Bear Ave Maplewood, MN 55109

If you haven't already, check out my books at: amazon.com/Tov-Rose/e/B004WLJN1KHave a blessed week until we meet again! :-)
-TOV

Democrats falsely claim conservatives are racists. Let’s pretend for a moment it’s true… So what?

Democrats falsely claim conservatives are racists. Let’s pretend for a moment it’s true… So what?


From the moment that Barack Obama threw his hat into the ring for President, Democrats have been accusing those who disagree with him of being racists. They are of course being disingenuous, pernicious and at the end of the day, most importantly, wrong.

But what if they weren’t? Let’s say somehow the entire universe of conservatives was made up of racists… so what? Does it change the veracity of their stated disagreements with President Obama? If it were in fact the case that conservatives hate him because he is black does that mean that their well thought out, reasonable and clearly articulated reasons for opposing him are somehow less valid? No, of course it doesn’t.

This issue makes me think of hate crimes. I’ve never been a supporter of hate crime legislation. Not because I like crimes or hate, but because it’s the act that makes something a crime, not the real or imagined hate. If someone beats up someone else because of their race or sexual orientation or religion, they should be prosecuted for assault, period. Is a victim any less injured or dead because the perpetrator assaulted them for their money instead of their – fill in the blank characteristic? No, obviously not. That’s ridiculous. The criminal justice system should deal with the crime and not worry about trying to look into the soul of the criminal.

In the same way, politics should focus on people’s words and actions and not try and look into the souls of the various participants. Why? Because that is all we can really know about a person. As George Bush discovered with Vladimir Putin, it’s impossible to look into someone’s soul and know what is going on in there. Along those same lines, when Steve Jobs died I wrote that it was possible that he was selfish son of a bitch, but I’d never know. What I do know however is that his words and actions did a great deal of good for hundreds of millions of people around the world. It didn’t matter if Jobs thought PC users were mental dwarves when compared to the Mensa like intelligence demonstrated by those who use Macs. He opened up iTunes to everyone and changed the world of music. It’s what he did that changed the world not what was going on in his soul. But of course race plus politics is something altogether different.

Race has been an issue swirling around Barack Obama since he first declared his candidacy and then continued once he became President. There was the whole Jeremiah Wright deal and Obama’s spending two decades in his church but somehow inexplicably never hearing a single racist comment. There was his knee jerk reaction that the Cambridge police department “acted stupidly” without knowing the facts of the case. There was his attorney general dropping voter intimidation charges against the demonstrably guilty New Black Panther Party. And just last month the President revived African-Americans for Obama. Can one imagine the outrage if Mitt Romney created a Whites for Romney organization?

To the degree that race is an issue for President Obama, it’s either been because he is making it so or because his party is using it as a red herring to deflect criticism of their agenda. The most obvious example of the latter was during the ObamaCare debate when the Democrats famously accused protesters of using racial epithets and spitting on black congressmen. The late Andrew Breitbart did a good job of dispensing with those charges.

That brings us to the basic element of liberal politics. Their default position towards anyone who opposes Barack Obama and the Democratic Party’s socialist agenda is to accuse them of being racist and that is supposed to be the end of the conversation. In that kind of an environment a conservative simply cannot win – how do you disprove something for which the mere accusation itself is seemingly enough to prove guilt? You can’t. My suggestion therefore is to take a different tack altogether: Don’t try. Rather, I suggest playing the hypothetical card. Instead of trying to disprove the undisprovable, instead suggest: “Ok, let’s pretend I am what you have painted me to be, and let’s assume that’s not going to change… now let’s talk about the issues.”

Now of course many of the good and principled liberals will demure to discuss the issues because they feel it’s inappropriate to discuss politics with racists other than to demonstrate their own non-racist bona fides. In that case you might then suggest to them that if their leader can advocate sitting down and talking with people who want to wipe the United States off the face of the planet they might deign to talk with people who simply want to discuss things like the tax code, the EPA and healthcare.

Don’t hold your breath however. Apparently liberals / Democrats believe that if one is racist (or more accurately, is labeled racist by them) then you are simply not qualified to have a voice in the political arena and your issues need not be addressed. That’s quite a leap for a party whose Senate leader for a decade was a man who had been an Exalted Cyclops of the KKK and filibustered to block the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Conservatives need not acquiesce to the liberal’s attempt to stifle public discourse. By calling their bluff and taking the non sequitur of racism off the table, conservatives have the opportunity to expose the liberal agenda for what it is, nothing but a recipe for disaster of a cleptocratic nanny state. In doing so and by discussing the facts rather than letting Democrats malign the messengers of the messages they fear, perhaps we can once again allow the American people to focus on the real issues facing the country rather than parrying with shadows of a Democrat created illusion with no basis in reality. Top Books

Democratic Party Flying OBAMA Flag (Is this North Korea)?

Some things just make you scratch your head wondering what in the world is going on in your world. Ever have a day like that? I did after seeing this article about Democrats in Florida flying a "USA" flag missing the stars, but with a face of the President on it. I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but you have to at least scratch your head at this one...

By Paul Stanley , Christian Post Reporter

March 14, 2012|4:10 pm

A veteran who saw what resembled a U.S. flag with President Obama's image where the stars were supposed to be demanded that the Lake County, Fla., Democratic Party remove the flag which flew outside their headquarters.

"It's absolutely disrespectful," 71-year-old veteran Jim Bradford told Fox News. "It's totally ridiculous. To put somebody's picture there, to me, it's a disgrace to do that."

The flag with the president's image was spotted flying under the American flag outside of the Democrat Party office. Bradford took pictures of the flag in front of the headquarters and after researching the issue and finding it was in violation of U.S. law.

Since the property is in Florida, Statute 256.05 of the state's code says: "No person shall, in any manner, for exhibition or display:

"(1) Place or cause to be placed any word, figure, mark, picture, design, drawing or advertisement of any nature upon any flag, standard, color, ensign or shield of the United States or of this state, or authorized by any law of the United States or this state; or

"(2) Expose to public view any such flag, standard, color, ensign or shield upon which shall have been printed, painted or otherwise produced, or to which shall have been attached, appended, affixed or annexed any such word, figure, mark, picture, design, drawing or advertisement."

Like us on Facebook 

Soon after Bradford circulated a picture of the flag, a group of veterans showed up at the Democratic Party office and delivered the chairwoman of the Lake County Democratic Party, Nancy Hurlbert, a copy of the federal code governing the U.S. flag.

"We read that to her, but she would not accept that," Bradford told Fox News. "The discussion finally got a little heated."

Bradford and his group offered to take the flag down, instead replacing it with the POW/MIA flag the group offered as a gift, but Hurlbert declined their offer. "No, you will not," Hurlbert told the veterans. "This is private property."

The chairlady said the flag had been given to the group as a gift and had been flying in front of the headquarters for about two months. Before Bradford and his fellow veterans showed up there had been no complaints.

"It leads me to believe that it's not about the flag," Hurlbert told Fox News. "Certain elements cannot accept Barack Obama as president."

Hurlbert eventually relented and removed the flag, but when asked if she or Democratic Party officials would fly it again, Hurlbert would not say.

"I won't say no and I won't say yes," she said. "We want to find out what our legal rights are."

The group's chairlady refused to take the POW/MIA flag. It has also been determined that the flag with Obama's image was made in China. Several states have introduced and passed legislation requiring that all U.S. flags been made in America.

http://www.christianpost.com/news/veterans-call-obama-flag-disrespectful-demand-removal-from-democrat-hq-71440/

Top Books

Obama Not Showing Up to Court in Georgia is BAD for Obama. Here's Why...

Just a little thought that is probably going through the largest cohesive voting group in the USA (That would be the Conservatives, not the Liberals). Yes, 43% of Americans are Conservative. Now, you might think that the rest would be Liberals, right? Wrong. The rest of population is divided into other groups, Liberals being just one of them. So, what is going through the mind of the Majority voting block (conservatives)?

Probably something like this:
Regardless of political persuasion, a sitting U.S. president openly defying a court subpoena for a hearing at which evidence indicating he’s a usurper is entered into the record is newsworthy.

However, a look at mainstream media websites shows an almost total blackout.

CNN, ABC, CBS and NBC did not run any coverage on Thursday’s hearing, with the exception of some local affiliates in Atlanta. The Fox News Channel’s report was a day later.

The Atlanta Journal Constitution was one of the few newspapers to cover the event; however, its coverage did not discuss the ramifications if the judge were to rule Obama ineligible to appear on the ballot.

Obama, who is a private citizen running for the office of the President in 2012 has refused to defend himself in a court case meant to determine if he can be on the ballot in George. Why would a sane person intending to win a campaign refuse to participate?

The strategy decision by Obama to simply ignore the subpoena and the hearing may ultimately backfire, because judges typically aren’t pleased to listen to arguments from someone who wants to introduce evidence during an appeal, when they have refused to do so in the original case. He’s not above the law. That’s a very important thing here. He’s a private person running for office, so he had no business not showing up. So the court can enter the judgment, and then the secretary of state does what he wants with it. And this will have a ripple effect for other secretaries of state, for other states, for the public. Also for any case that could be pending in the Supreme Court, where the issue of Mr. Obama’s eligibility is implicated. This will be significant because of this:

The attorneys challenging Obama's eligibility to be on the Georgia Ballot were able to enter all of their evidence into the official Court record. Obama and his attorneys did not enter anything at all into the official Court record.

Here's a little more information for you to understand how important this is...
A Default is a typical result when one side fails to appear for a dispute that’s being adjudicated in court, but in this case, that would have left it wide open for arguments on appeal that had nothing to do with the issue. The challenging parties explained to the judge that awarding a default judgment actually would have been rewarding Obama for failing to respond to the subpoena. The judge was considering just entering a default judgment against Obama. The plaintiffs’ attorneys uniformly did not want the judge to do that because there wouldn’t be any evidence in the record at all.

The judge agreed.

For the first time since court cases challenging Obama's legal status to hold office as a "natural born citizen" began, evidence has been entered into the official Court record and Obama failed to submit supporting evidence. This is very bad for Obama and will not go away, because approximately 43% of people in the nation will not allow the issue to go away.

Pay attention to this very significant statement:
Although Obama’s lawyer at least made a motion to quash the subpoena for his testimony and records, Obama’s attorneys never even bothered to respond to their/his own motion to produce records showing supporting proof that Obama is eligible to be on the ballot in Georgia.

This is bad for Obama.